Skip to main content

Evaluation

Receive feedback from experts.

Evaluation Panel

The Evaluation Panel judges have been carefully chosen for their knowledge and experience. Each judge scores and comments on the submissions assigned to them using the scoring rubric. Each valid submission will receive between 0.0 to 5.0 points on each criterion, representing a total possible scoring range between 0 to 20 from each Evaluation Panel judge. Each valid submission will receive five sets of feedback and scores that have been statistically balanced to ensure fairness for everyone. The top scoring submissions based on the Evaluation Panel scores will be referred to the Selection Committee for a second round of scoring.

Selection Committee

Informed by results of the Evaluation Panel, top-scoring proposals will be presented to the Selection Committee for review using the same scoring rubric, resulting in an additional set of scores and feedback for each top-scoring participant. Each of these top-scoring submissions will receive between 0.0 to 5.0 points on each criterion, representing a total possible scoring range between 0 to 20 from each Selection Committee judge. The highest scoring submission in each Solution Category based on Selection Committee scores will be presented to DSHS Leadership for final determination of the award of a contract.

Final Award Determination

DSHS Leadership will select up to one winner for each of the four solution categories. Each winner will receive a contract of up to $250,000 to implement their solutions for Washington agencies and residents.

DSHS Leadership will make final determination of the awards with consideration of scores and feedback from both the Evaluation Panel and Selection Committee. The selection process will also determine which solutions provide the best value in meeting the needs of DSHS in each solution category. Selection of contracts will depend on assessment of multiple factors, including participant qualifications, capabilities, efficiency, experience, reliability, responsibility, integrity, quality of proposed services and deliverables, timeliness, cost and potential impact on DSHS’ needs. DSHS may consider whether the proposed solution encourages diverse contractor participation; provides competitive pricing, economies and efficiencies; considers human health and environmental impacts; appropriately weighs cost and non-cost considerations; and life cycle cost, as applicable. DSHS may also consider a participant’s performance on prior State of Washington or other contracts. The DSHS Leadership Team reserves the right to select solutions deemed to offer the best overall value and that is in the best interests of DSHS and the State of Washington. 

Review the rules for more information.

Create meaningful impact for Washington residents and communities

The Business Integrity Challenge will identify one winner for each of the four solution categories who will each receive a contract of up to $250,000.
XX Days to Register